Home | About Us | Product Range / Download Catalog | Authority Approval | SIRIM Report | Project Reference | Location Map | Contact | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SITE CONTENT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
» Product Range
|
Type of Stainless Steel Comparison 2. SUS 304 – Non Magnetic 3. SUS 316 – Slightly magnetic after forming 4. SUS 439 - Magnetic 5. SUS 444 – Magnetic Test Result-Comparison SUS 304 and SUS 439 1. Typical Chloride Stress Cracking test results in boiling solutions
Conclusion : SUS 439 Seems to have better chloride stress cracking resistance as compared to SUS 304 and SUS 316.
2. Typical General Corrosion (Rusty) Data
Conclusion: SUS 439 appears to have better corrosion (rusty) resistance as compared to SUS 304 at the above mentioned boiling solutions. LAKASA commitment to deliver Good Quality Products & 1 Year Warranty on material welding defects Stainless steel 439, 304, 444 and 316 are proved good and suitable for fabrication of Water Tanks and Interceptors and thus are among our material options. Stainless steel 202 (non magnetic), is relatively weak and bad resistance to corrosion and oxidation as compared to SUS 439, 304, 444 and 316. As such, SUS202 is excluded from the list of our choices. Download LAKASA™ Full Product Catalogue Information |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2005-2016 Lakasa2u.com All Rights Reserved. Web design & hosting from EAS.my |