Home | About Us | Product Range / Download Catalog | Authority Approval | SIRIM Report | Project Reference | Location Map | Contact

     
SITE CONTENT

» Product Range
Biomatic Grease Interceptor
Biomatic Liquid Enzyme
Auto-Dosing Unit (ADU)
Sediment Interceptor
Floor Sediment Trap
Oil Interceptor
Neutralization Tank
Sand Interceptor
Lint Interceptor
Stainless Steel Grade
 
» Installation Guide
 
» Authority Approval
 
» SIRIM Test Report
 
» Environment Quality Act
 
» Project Reference
 
» Product Presentation
Grease Interceptor / Oil Interceptor
 

 

Type of Stainless Steel Comparison
 
1. SUS 202 – Non Magnetic
. 4% nickel alloy.
. Bad resistance to corrosion and oxidation as compared to SUS 304 and SUS 439

2. SUS 304 – Non Magnetic
. 8% nickel, 18% chromium alloy, No titanium content.
. Excellent resistance to stress cracking.
. Good resistance to corrosion.
. Good oxidation resistance.
. Good weldability.

3. SUS 316 – Slightly magnetic after forming
. Highly corrosion resistance

4. SUS 439 - Magnetic
. A Titanium stabilized, 18% chromium alloy. No nickel content.
. Excellent resistance to stress cracking.
. Good resistance to corrosion.
. Good oxidation resistance.
. Good weldability.
. High thermal conductivity coefficient.
. Low thermal expansion coefficient.

5. SUS 444 – Magnetic
. Equal in corrosion resistance to SUS 316.

Test Result-Comparison SUS 304 and SUS 439

1. Typical Chloride Stress Cracking test results in boiling solutions

Alloy 42%MgC 33%LiCI 26%NaCI
SUS 304 20 hours 96 hours 744 hours
SUS 316 21 hours 21 hours 1000 hours
SUS 439 1000 hours 1000 hours 1000 hours

Conclusion : SUS 439 Seems to have better chloride stress cracking resistance as compared to SUS 304 and SUS 316.

 

2. Typical General Corrosion (Rusty) Data
 

Boiling Solution
Corrosion rate in inches per month (millimeters per year)
SUS 439SUS 304
20% Phosphoric Acid 0.0002(0.006) 0.0002(0.006)
10% Sodium Bisulfate 0.0001(0.003) 0.005(1.53)
10% Sulfamic Acid 0.0008(0.025) 0.013(4.0)

Conclusion: SUS 439 appears to have better corrosion (rusty) resistance as compared to SUS 304 at the above mentioned boiling solutions.


 
LAKASA commitment to deliver Good Quality Products & 1 Year Warranty on material welding defects

Stainless steel 439, 304, 444 and 316 are proved good and suitable for fabrication of Water Tanks and Interceptors and thus are among our material options. Stainless steel 202 (non magnetic), is relatively weak and bad resistance to corrosion and oxidation as compared to SUS 439, 304, 444 and 316. As such, SUS202 is excluded from the list of our choices.

 

 
Download LAKASA™ Full Product Catalogue Information
 

 
© 2005-2016 Lakasa2u.com All Rights Reserved.   Web design & hosting from EAS.my